-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Little refactoring of OrdVector #320
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #320 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.76% 72.74% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 33 33
Lines 4167 4146 -21
Branches 958 953 -5
==========================================
- Hits 3032 3016 -16
Misses 755 755
+ Partials 380 375 -5
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found no Colonel nor Major issues. Consider removing the commented code, it will haunt us in future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should measure the introduced optimizations quickly (just a simple script, for loop calling these functions with each version). For further comments, see the opened discussions.
10b9f95
to
317690d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Few little things in OrdVector:
Small debordelization of utils.hh
Does anyone know how the push_back/emplace_back in OrdVector should be done?